CURRENT MISSION

Explore the world, meet people of all types without any bias, from the craziest to the quietest, marveling at this beautiful planet that we call "Earth" and nourish intellectual, emotionally and spiritually of every person who crosses my life and if I do

ABOUT ME

Well, apart from the things I've more or less told me I can also tell you that I am an adventurous, fun, happy, I love reading a lot, I love the chess, I am a lover of cinema and music in general and am extremely athlete.
My friends say I'm rather mad because I'm not afraid to make fools of the another second and get to talk to a scientist like, hehehe, I do not think being a hero or anything like that but I will not tolerate injustice or myself or anyone else, remember that the majority of the fights that I had from little to protect the partners or friends who are always being mistreated by the typical big idiot for being physically larger thought of trespass law with weaker partners, and therefore, since small have a natural tendency to reject any kind of injustice, I directly affects me or not, but I particularly am a peaceful and friendly, as I'm concerned the only war they should be valid is that which must be fought on the bedrooms of desperate lovers of passion, hehehe.
On the other hand am a person that I greatly appreciate the friendship, my life is meaningless if not shared with my friends, they, friends, when true, are like brothers to me, the great moments of my life have been lived with them and ill as well, if there is one thing that I appreciate much of life is to have known these friends I have from my childhood with them are like the Musketeers, "One for all and all for one".

And finally say that of course one of my main passions in life is travel, I am an ex-officio of all strange things in life, I love to keep me informed of everything that happens in the world even far from where I live, and primarily'm a sincere partner and I love to chat about everything no matter the topic because I have a knack for communicating and expressing myself unless the language barrier will not let me.
But mostly I am passionate about life, I try to enjoy every second as the last, I like my biological clock to squeeze every last drop of vitality that the universe by chance or not granted me, everything I do, each person with whom I speak, every time I share with someone, etc. I do so with the greatest passion possible.
Finally note also that any young man my age really enjoy going out dancing, going out with girls, etc..
So good, I hope that what I tell them my be a little helpful and while I realize that although one person is not always necessarily good life will be pink but not why we should stop trying to be, because in the end After all no one chooses who he is, you just born and there encounters a world that is already established, so always first and foremost before we criticize and point out someone put before us a large mirror and instead be staring us in it a good time.

And finally now, I think everyone can really teach something no matter how different and I think we can all learn something from all of it as the great Galileo Galilei: "I've never known a man so ignorant that I was impossible to learn something from him .

PHILOSOPHY

My philosophy of life is roughly that of "Do what you want".
But that does not mean doing whatever one wants without taking into account the other, not that it is not, is about freedom, tolerance, understanding and being authentic with the things you want to do.
So I'd like to leave here is a script monkey reflecting 99% of my philosophy of life, my feelings and how I see the world in a way, I hope you know if you're interested take time to read it because it is based on the work of Fernando Savater which is called "Ethics for Amador and it was this work which largely influenced my way of being and seeing the world.
Here we go:

ETHICS FOR AMADOR

1. I will do ethics

There are sciences that are studied for simple, others to learn a skill most of them were to get a job and earn him life. Please feel curiosity or need for such studies can easily do without them. There are plenty of interesting knowledge without which one manages to live quite well.

Certain things you can learn or not, at will. Since nobody can know everything, no choice but to accept with humility and how much they know. Yet other things have to know them because of it, life is going. One must be aware, for example, that jump from the sixth floor balcony of a thing is not good for health, or that a diet of nails and prussic acid can not reach old age. Little things are important as well. You can live in many ways but there are ways that keep living.

In short, among all possible knowledge there is at least one essential: that certain things and others do not suit us if we continue living. So some things we agree and what we should we call 'good' because we feel good, others, however, but we feel very bad and all that we call 'bad'. Learn what we need, ie to distinguish between good and evil, is knowledge that we all try to acquire.

In the field of human relations, these ambiguities occur with even greater frequency. Lying is something totally wrong, because it destroys confidence in the word and alienates people, but sometimes it seems that may be useful or beneficial to get some ventajilla lie. Or even as a favor to someone. On the other hand, who always tells the truth - who falls - tends to dislike everyone. The bad times seem to be more or less good and good is sometimes bad appearances.

I know life is not so easy because there are various conflicting views about what to do. Some say that the most noble is to live for others and others point out that the most useful is getting people to live for one. .

The only thing that at first glance we all agree on is that we do not agree with everyone. these different views in another match point: namely, that whatever is going to be our life is at least partly a result of what everyone wants. In the wild, every animal seems to know exactly what is good and what is bad for him, without discussion or hesitation. No animals are ill or good in nature, although perhaps considered bad fly frog tends to his trap and eats.

And so to the key word of all this mess: freedom. Animals have no choice but to be as they are and do what they are naturally programmed to do. They can not be blamed that they do not cheer for it because they can not do otherwise. Such mandatory provision undoubtedly saves many headaches. To some extent, men are programmed by nature. And in a less imperious but similar, our cultural program is critical: our thought is conditioned by language that gives shape and are educated in certain traditions, habits, ways of behaving, legends ... in short, that we inculcated from the cradle about loyalties and not others. All this weighs a lot and makes us quite predictable.

With men you can never be certain, while the animals or other natural beings themselves. For many biological and cultural programming that we, men can always opt for something that ultimately is not in the program. We can say yes or no, willy-nilly. However crumpled to see you by circumstances, never have a single way forward but several.

When I talk of freedom is this what I mean. it is true that we are not obliged to want to do one thing. And here it should be noted two clarifications regarding freedom:

First: We are not free to choose what happens to us but free to respond to what happens to us in a particular way
Second: Be free to try something has nothing to do with do without fail. It is not the same freedom (that is to choose the extent possible) the omnipotence (which would always get what you want, though it seemed impossible). Therefore, the more ability to act, we can obtain better results for our freedom.

In reality there are many forces that limit our freedom, from earthquakes or disease to tyrants. But our freedom is a force in the world, our strength. As you look a little, you'll see that those who speak and think who are complaining but in reality are very pleased to know that they are free. As we are not free, we can not be blamed for anything that happens to us ... "One may consider that choose voluntarily to certain things in certain circumstances is very difficult and it is better to say that there is no freedom to not recognize that free the easiest is preferred.

In contrast to other beings, living or inanimate, men can invent and partly choose our way of life. We can choose what we think is good, that is convenient for us, versus what we think is bad and undesirable. And as we can invent and choose, we can make mistakes, which is something that the beavers, bees and termites rarely happen to them. So it seems prudent to look at what we do and seek to acquire a certain knowledge that allows us to live it right. In that knowing how to live, or art of living if you prefer, is what we call ethics.

2. Personal opinion

In this chapter the author talks about what can be good and bad, from what we want, this is no mention that what we need is for us what is good, but in order to develop this we should have a number of obstacles, which I think are what the others will agree, but this convenience is not what we consider to be good but as evil, so that is where obstacles arise, but we must know that there are things that are made just to do something which may also pose an obstacle, but from the example of bees and beavers, we realize that it is practically impossible to carry out activities that are within what I consider as a possible fantasy or something.

In this chapter the author makes a comparison of the man with the animals he mentions to termites and Hector (character that is part of work of Homer's Iliad) who is a warrior as part of the termites that comprise the " kingdom ", I think in this part of the chapter the author tries to teach or imply that man has the privilege of being free, because the man has the ability to decide what they want and in this case the termites can not change what you have to do as I think the reasoning is not enough to know what suits them. Although the author tells us that we can not do as we think if we can do but the thing done can cost you not very nice, but it is also true that in some way have a somewhat limited freedom because there are things that happen to us and are not product of the action of another person who does not benefit us, but that harm us in something, or simply things that we can not take part. When will we face, I think it's very similar to what I have been mentioning above because although there are differences, this will lead us to perform an activity well or badly with all this together and taking it for good way, from my point of view after seeing the author's reflection, I think it will create what for us would be happiness.

3. Orders, customs and whims

Clearly there are things that we agree to live and sometimes not, but not always clear what are the things which suit us. Although we can not choose what happens to us, however we choose what to address what happens to us. When we do something, we do because we prefer to do that to do otherwise, or because we prefer it not to. Sometimes circumstances force us to choose between two options not chosen: there are times when we choose but rather not have to choose.

Almost every time we reflect on important and difficult situations about what we do find ourselves in a difficult situation. But of course, not always things get so ugly. Sometimes circumstances are less stormy.

Usually, you do not spend their lives turning over what we should or we should do. If we are to be honest, we must recognize that most of our actions we make almost automatically, without giving too much around the issue has acted almost instinctively, without plantearte many problems. In the background is the easiest and most effective. Sometimes giving too many laps you're going to make us back. .

Let's check then the number of different reasons you have for your morning behavior. You know what a 'reason' is the reason or at least think you have to do something, the most acceptable explanation for your behavior when you reflect on it a bit. In a word: the best response you can think to question 'why do that? ". Well, one type of motivation is to recognize that I command you to do this or that. For this reason we call them orders. Sometimes the reason is that always do the same gesture, and you repeat it without thinking, or even to see that all around the world and behaves regularly: this game call customs memorandum. In other cases the reason appears to be the absence of motive, if you feel like no other, pure win. Do you agree that call whims as to why these behaviors? I leave aside the more starkly functional reasons, ie to induce you to do those gestures as pure and direct tool to get something down the stairs to get to the street instead of jumping out the window, take the bus to to school, use a cup to take your coffee with milk, etc..

We will limit ourselves merely to the three types of reasons, ie orders, customs and whims. Each of these reasons tilt your conduct in one direction or another, explains about your preference for doing what you do versus the many other things you could do. Get up for school is required to clean your teeth or shower and I think a lot more than kicking the can of coca-cola, while, at least wear pants or shorts for a long hot it is as binding as going to cole, What I mean is that each type has its own weight reasons and you conditioned on your way. The orders, for example, draw their strength partly from fear that you may have to appalling reprisals taken against you if you do not obey me, but also, I suppose, affection and trust that I have and that makes you think I command that is to protect and improve yourself or as they say with words that makes a wry face, for your sake. Also since then because you expect some sort of reward if you meet as it should: pay and free gifts. Customs, however, comes more from the comfort of routine follow at times and also of your interest in not offending the other, ie the pressure of others. Also in the customs there is something like an obedience to certain types of orders.

The orders and customs have one thing in common: they seem to come from outside, which is imposed on you without your permission. In contrast, whims come from within you, sprout spontaneously without anyone you send them or anyone else believe in principle to imitate them. I suppose if I ask that when you feel freer to follow orders, to follow the custom or making your fancy, tell me you're more free to make your whim, because it is something more yours and not dependent on anyone more than you. Of course who knows: maybe also called fancy as you want because you imitate someone or perhaps stems from an order but in reverse, by seeking to contradict, a desire that you will not have woken up to you alone without Prior to disobey the mandate.

And if in the situation where the command is not enough, the custom still less. The custom is for the ordinary, for everyday routine. You yourself religiously wear pants and underpants every morning, but if a fire does not give you no time you feel too guilty. When things are really serious you have to invent, not simply limited to following the fashion or habit ...

Neither seems to be occasion to indulge the whims. In stormy times the healthy person you miss almost every whim and nothing left but the intense desire for matching the most appropriate course of action, that is: more rational.

Opinion

In this chapter the author highlights what for me is the responsibility or our will to live (from the examples poses the book). But still no stopping what is freedom, which still applies since you have to keep making decisions, based on the problems we are presenting in life as a product of our own act, in this chapter, the author sets an example for a sea captain, who must decide between complying and not complying with work or could be between life and death and the rest of the fleet, in this chapter presents us with the customs, what are the activities normally performed by men without thinking because it performs such activities as getting up, or clothing to go outside the customs for me are the issues that exist in the life of each, which if not exist in someone's life could be seen as someone who is not well mentally speaking (this referring to the activities of dressing and other common activities in human society), the vagaries see them as aspects of the lives of every person who as I mostly do not lead to anything very productive to say, because a whim is something that only matters to a person which is having such a whim, and not society in general although this treaty chapter, I think it's the only one who has almost absolute freedom.

In contrast and custom orders are not free act as inner thoughts but not something that is imposed by someone.

4. Do what you want

We said earlier that most of the things we do because they send us, because they usually do them well, because they are a means to get what we want or simply because it gives us the air vent or caprice of them, so without further ado . It turns out that on important occasions or when we take what we do very seriously, all of these motivations current unsatisfactory: we, who know little, as they say.

This has to do with the issue of freedom, which is the subject of properly dealing with ethics Liberty is to say 'yes' or 'no', I do or not do, whatever they say my bosses or others , that suits me and I want it, that does not suit me and therefore I do not want. Freedom is to decide, but also, do not forget, you realize you're deciding. As opposed to letting go, as you will understand. And you do not get carried no choice but to try to think at least twice what you do, yea, twice, sorry, but your brain hurt ... The first time I think the reason for your action the answer to the question 'why do this? "Because I do send him, because it is customary to do so, because I feel like it. But if you think for a second time, the thing and varies. This I do because I send him, but ... Why obey what they send me? "For fear of punishment?, Why hope for a prize?, Then am I not as enslaved to whom I send? If I obey because who gives the orders knows more than me, would it not be advisable to seek to inform me enough to decide for myself? What if they send me things I did not seem appropriate, as when the commander ordered him to remove Jewish Nazi concentration camp? May not be something "bad" - that is, not convenient for me - as much as I command, or "good" and nobody should even order?

The same applies to the customs. If I do not think more than once, perhaps sufficient for me the answer that I act like "because it is custom. And when I ask myself a second time on my whims, the result is similar. Many times I want to do things quickly turn against me, which I regret later. In small matters whim may be acceptable, but when it comes to more serious things get carried away by it, without thinking whether it is a fad convenient or inconvenient it may be unwise, even dangerous: always cross the whim of the red lights maybe once or twice is funny but I get to old if I try to do day after day?

In a nutshell: there can be orders, customs and quirks that are adequate reasons for acting, but others need not be. It would be an idiot to want to be contrary to all orders and all customs, as well as all fads because it is sometimes convenient or pleasant. But never an action is good only for being a command, a custom or a whim. To find out if something is really not convenient or I will have to consider what I do further, arguing for myself. Nobody can be free in my place, ie no one can dispense with choice and look for myself. When a young child is immature, with little knowledge of life and reality simply obedience routine or whim. But because it still is depending on someone, in the hands of another who watches over us. Then you need to be adult, ie, able to somehow invent their own lives and not simply to live the others have invented for you. Naturally, we can invent entirely because we do not live alone and many things are forced on us willy-nilly But among the orders given to us, among the customs that surround us or we believe, between the vagaries that beset us, we must learn to choose for ourselves. There will be no choice but to be men and not sheep to think twice about what we do. And if you press me, to three and sometimes four times indicated.

The word "moral" is related etymologically customs, since that is exactly what the Latino voice: mores, and with the orders because most of the sound moral precepts like "you must do so" or " do not ever make such another. " However, there are custom orders which can be bad, or is "immoral" by very orderly and accustomed to our way. If we want to strengthen the morality of truth, if we want to seriously learn how to use the freedom we have good, better left orders, customs and whims. The first thing to make clear is that the ethics of a free man has nothing to do with punishment or the prizes awarded by the authority that is, human or divine authority, for that matter is the same. He who does nothing but run away from punishment and reward for dispensing other, according to rules established by them, no better than a poor slave.

"Moral" is the set of behaviors and rules that you and I and some of those around us we tend to accept as valid, 'ethics' is the reflection on why we consider valid and comparison with other "moral" with different people.

I remember that the words 'good' and 'bad' does not only apply to moral behavior, or even just people.

For some, being good means being resigned and patient, but others will call ahead to the doer, original, not cringe when you think that while it may annoy someone. Because we do not know what they are for humans.

It can be a good man in many ways and views which try behaviors often vary according to circumstances. Well accepted that there are many ways of being and that the issue depends on the context in which it moves each. So you see that from the outside is not easy to determine who's good and who bad, who should and who does not. Should consider not only all the circumstances of each case, but to the intentions that motivate each.

No order, no customs or whims sufficient to guide us in this matter of ethics, and now there is no clear regulation that teaches man to be always good and function as such, how can we manage? "Do what you want." Why, yes it is moral to the conclusion we have arrived!, Which if everyone would arm him without further ado what I wanted!.

Opinion
In this part of the book does not pose a kind of decision which we can make direct blame something or not, depending on what records exist for this activity, which may have been made voluntarily or under orders from someone. Here the author and do not plant all the above example, but talking about a Nazi commandant and racism posed examples tell us that man is not always to blame for what he does, from that often This has limited their freedom, having to obey orders from someone who is considered most important in the person performing the activity. But these orders can be disobedience since the release of the person are not affected when making the order, order that can be good or bad, but it will be classified by means of consciousness, but can also be the appearance of absolute obedience to that order, but these facts comes morality which tells us whether or not to accept what we are commanded to do, in what is the classification of good and evil are not only this but these two can be used to describe what is done. As well we can describe the people around us and society in general, depending on the latter and in a more particular from qualifying our opinion about it.

5. Date the good life

What do I mean to say putting a "do what you want" as the motto of ethics to which we are feeling? Then you simply must be left orders and customs of rewards and punishments, in a word of what he wants to guide you from the outside, and you have to plantearte whole thing from yourself, from deep inside your will. Do not ask anyone what you do with your life: Ask yourself to yourself. If you want to know how you can best use your freedom, do not miss putting you right from the start the service of another or others, for good, wise and respectable they may be: questions about using your freedom ... to freedom itself.

If you say 'do what you want "seems I'm giving you an order anyway," do this and not that "even if the order to act freely. If it does, the disobedient (because you do what you are, but what I want I send you), if the disobedient, the meet (because you do what you want instead of what I command you ... But that is precisely what I'm sending!). This is not about to pass the time, but of living well. The apparent contradiction that contains this "do what you want" is not a reflection of the essential problem of freedom itself: namely, that we are free not to be free, we have no choice but to be. So one of our century French philosopher, Jean-Paul Sartre said that "we are condemned to freedom." For that conviction no pardon worth ...

So my "do what you want" is not just a way of telling you that you take seriously the problem of your freedom, so that nobody can dispensarte of creative responsibility to choose your path. Ask not too morbid if 'worth' all the fuss of freedom, because you want or you are not free, like it or not you have to want. Although you say you do not know anything about these matters so annoying and leave you alone, you also wanted to know nothing, wanting to leave you in peace even at the expense of aborregarte a little or a lot. But do not confuse this "do what you want" with the vagaries of which we spoke earlier. It's one thing to do "whatever you want 'and quite another to do" the first thing that pleases you. I'm not saying that at times may not be enough outright win something.

Life is made of time, our present is full of memories and hopes. If I tell you whatever you want, the first thing is that it seems desirable to carefully and thoroughly think about what they want. No doubt many things you crave, often contradictory, as happens to everyone: you want a bike but do not want to break your neck on the road, you have friends without losing your independence, you have money but do not want to subjugate the neighbor to get it, you know things and understand why that should be studied but also want to have fun, I do not want to nag you and let you live your way but is also there to help when needed, and so on. Miskito That's what I would advise: when I said 'Do what you like' what the fund is intended to recommend that you dare to give you the good life. And pay no attention to the sad or the blessed, ethics is only the rational attempt to find out how to live better. If it's worth an interest in ethics is because we like the good life. Only someone who was born to slave or who are so afraid of death that he believes nothing matters devoted to lentils and lives in any way ...

Want to give you the good life: great. But you also want the good life the good life is not a cauliflower or a beetle, but a good human life. It is what is yours, I think. And I'm sure that it would not relinquish it for the world. Humans, consists mainly of having relationships with other human beings. precisely the grace of all these things is that you appear more favorably with others! Through the money is expected to dazzle or buy from others are for clothes for us to like or envy, and so the good house, fine wines, and so on. Very few things retain their grace in solitude, and if solitude is complete and definitive, all things are hopelessly embittered. The good life is good life among human beings or that otherwise may be life but it is neither good nor human.

Things can be beautiful and useful, the animals are cute, but men want to be is that humans, not tools or bugs. And we also want to be treated as humans, for that of mankind depends largely on which we do with each other. the man is not only a natural reality but also a cultural phenomenon. There is no humanity without cultural learning and to start without the foundation of every culture, language. The world we live in a world of humans is language, a reality of symbols and laws without which we could not only communicate with each other but also to grasp the significance of what surrounds us. But anyone can learn to speak for itself because language is a natural and biological function of man, but a cultural creation that we inherit and learn from other men.

So talk to someone and hear is treated as a person, at least start to give humane treatment. It is only a first step, of course, because the culture within which we humanize each other part of the language but not just language. There are other ways to demonstrate that we recognize as human, ie styles of consideration and respect that we humanizing to one another. We all want to be treated well and if not, we protest. Most important of all this: the humanization is a reciprocal process. So that others can make me human, I have to make them human, whether for me or all things are like beasts, I will not be better than a beast or a thing either. So be good life can be very different after all to give the good life.

Opinion
In the present chapter presents us with the car trying to make our actions more freely without taking much into account what other people praise trying to exert influence. But to achieve what is the good life I think that apart from I think we are happy to do what our consciences tell us, although this indication is not good for society in general, but for which the act takes place is far as it causes the most happiness from what appears on it. In this chapter the author tells us that to live happy to do my best and be your best at any point of view, and not raised in the book from the Bible, where we talk about the legacy for the eldest son to be happy given his inheritance to be happy that achieves at least momentarily, when the end may not have been worth it, as we plant the book from this decision that may emerge is repentance having done what was done previously, and all this to achieve a very short-term happiness. In this part of the book presents us with the economic aspect which I think is everywhere, problems of society which I believe is what is eating us from the great variety of problems that arise from this. For the above is the merchant Kane, who despite having a lot of money and power was not happy because to get what we had, had to create a lot of hatred, which could not provide the warmth needed to be happy, love that can not provide any living being except humans.

6. Wake up, baby!

It's pretty clear what we want (to give us the good life) but it is not so much that it is "the good life." And it is to want the good life is not wanting either, as when one wants lentils, tables, appliances or money. All these are quereres simple as it is set in one aspect of reality: they have no comprehensive overview. There is nothing wrong with wanting to lentils when hungry, of course: but in the world there are other things, other relationships due to past loyalties and hopes raised by the future, I do not know much more, everything that comes to mind. In a word, not just man lives lentils. Death is a very simplistic: when you're about to croak matter very little. Life, however, is always complex and often complications. If you're shun any complication and the great simplicity do not think I want to live longer and better but once you die.
The truth is that the things we have we have them also to us in return: we own owns us. What we have quite grasped also catches us in its way ... or is it better to be careful not to overdo.

The increased complexity of life is precisely that, that people are not things. At first I found it difficult: things are bought and sold. Things are used while serving and then thrown away.

Kid yourself: for one thing only can be drawn ... things. Nobody can give what is not, right?, Let alone nothing can give more than what it is. If men were simple things, so that things can give us enough. But that is the complication that I spoke of things as we are not pure, we need "things" that things have not. When we treat others as things, what we get from them are also things loose money to crush them, serve, come, come, they rub against us or smile when we press the button because ... But in this way will give us these gifts ever more subtle that only people can give. Do not get well or friendship, or respect, much less love. Nothing can bring this friendship, respect, love ... in short, the fundamental complicity that only occurs between equals and that you or me that we are people, we can offer more than other people who treat it as such. What treatment is important because we said that we humans humanize each other. By treating people as individuals and not as things I am doing I may be back so that only one person can give another.

But at least we have the respect of a person, if only one: ourselves. By eliminating the conversion to other things at least defend our right to be things for others. We try to make the world of people is.

Wake up at once, baby! The other, from outside, one can envy and not know that at that very moment we are dying of cancer. Are you going to prefer to please others to satisfy yourself? And I tell you to leave people alone and just think about yourself.

Precisely what ethics is trying to find out what is really about, beyond what we have or what we see on television ads, that happy good life that we would beat us. By now we know that no good life can do without things, but even fewer people can spend. A need to be handled things as things and people must be treated as individuals: in this way things will help us in many ways and people in one fundamental that nothing can replace the human being. Maybe being human is not important thing because we like it or not what we are hopeless ... But it can be human-human or human-thing, people just concerned in earning things in life, all things, the more things, better and dedicated human mankind to enjoy living among people! Please do not rebated, lets sale to department stores, that's your thing.

You can be ready for business or for politics and a solemn ass for more serious things of life as good or no.Te repeat a word that seems to me crucial potato this issue: attention. I am not referring to the attention of the owl, but the willingness to reflect on what you do and try my best to clarify the meaning of the "good life" we want to live. Not comfortable but dangerous simplifications, trying to understand the full complexity of this issue of living (I mean to live humanely), which takes the cake.

I think the first and indispensable condition of being ethical is determined to live anyway: he is convinced that nothing matters but sooner or later we will die. When speaking of "moral" people often refer to these orders and customs that are observed at least apparently, sometimes without really knowing why. But perhaps the real conundrum is not to abide by a code or be contrary to the established but in trying to understand why certain behaviors we agree and others do not understand what life is and what it can do "good 'for us humans. First of all, no content to be had for good, to look good to others, to give us approval. But the effort to make the decision has to do each one alone: no one can be free for you.

In this chapter the author is trying to explain is not to leave us a clearer idea what is the good life where we begin to explain the complications that arise in life have to be taken in a more simple, so to overcome these problems, but as that in raising the examples in this chapter, through these, I think it gives us a clear idea of what you are trying to say, speaks a little like referring to the future to prevent a possible factor our objectives, then to raise his example of the student and the teacher teaches us that it is not necessary to have everything to be happy, I think we look to come to pose the last two chapters, in the example the student realized that the have what they most wanted (two things from the room of his teacher) would not be happy because I was busy with both hands at the moment have a need that could be personal, a need that is not nice if you can not solve.

7. Jiminy Cricket appears

Do you know the only obligation we have in this life? Therefore not be stupid. The word "idiot" is more substantial than it seems, do not go thinking. Baculus comes from Latin meaning 'stick' the fool is the one who needs a cane to walk. The fool can be as agile and you want to frolic like a gazelle Olympic is not about that. If the idiot is not limping feet, but the mood: it is his spirit and crippled weakling, but his body tumbling havoc caused a paste. There are fools of several models to choose from:
a) He who believes he does not want anything that says that everything is indifferent, who lives in a perpetual yawn or permanent nap, even with eyes open and not snore.
b) Anyone who believes that wants it all, the first thing is presented and the opposite of what you have: go and stay, dancing and sitting, chewing garlic and kissing sublime, all at once.
c) does not know what he wants or bothers to find out. Imitates quereres of their neighbors or because they go against each other, all it does is dictated by the majority opinion of those around him: it is no reflection conformist or rebel without a cause.
d) He who knows he wants and knows what she wants and, more or less know why he wants but he wants flojito, afraid or weak. After all, always ends up doing what they do not want and leave for tomorrow what you want to see if then you are more toned.
e) Any person who wants to force and ferocity, in barbarous plan, but he has deceived himself about what is reality and misses it greatly confused the good life ends with what is going to make powder.
All these types of stupidity need a cane, that is, things need to rely on outsiders, outsiders who have nothing to do with freedom and reflection of their own.

Conclusion: Alert! On guard!, The stalks and does not condone stupidity!
One can be stupid at math (mea culpa!) And not be for the moral, that is, for the good life. And conversely, there are those who are lynxes for business and perfect for ethics cretins to avoid stupidity in any field requires attention, as we have said in the previous section, and make every effort to learn. These requirements match the natural or archaeological ethics. But the business of living well is not the same as knowing how much is two and two. Knowing how much is two and two is something precious, no doubt, but the moral imbecile is that wisdom that can save you from big bump.

The opposite of being morally imbecile is aware. But awareness is not something that touches one in a raffle or we fall from the sky. Of course, we must recognize that certain people are from small better "ear" than others and ethical 'good taste' spontaneous moral, but "heard" and that "good taste" can affirm and develop the practice

Well, I admit that in order to be aware it takes some innate qualities to appreciate or enjoy music and art. And I suppose some will also be favorable social and economic requirements as to who has been deprived from birth of what is humanly most needed is difficult to demand the same ease to understand what the good life than those who fared better. If no one treats you as a human, not infrequently go to the beast ... But once granted that minimum, I think the rest depends on the attention and effort from everyone. Consciousness is among the following features:
a) Know that nothing matters because we actually live and also live well, humanly well.
b) Be willing to look at whether what we do corresponds to what we really want or not.
c) Based on practice, go to develop the moral taste so that there are certain things we do naturally repugnant.
d) Renounce disguise seeking alibis that we are reasonably free and therefore responsible for the consequences of our actions.

You see, not invoke these descriptive features different reason for preferring it from here to there, the conscientious stupidity, your own advantage. Why is it bad what we call 'bad'? Because it leaves you living the good life we want. Usually the word "selfishness" is usually a bad press: it is called "selfish" who only cares about himself and does not care about others, to the point of boring quietly if this gets any benefit.

When it is stolen, that something (respect, friendship, love) loses all its good taste and eventually becomes a poison. The "selfish" are like those contestants on One, two, three or just the price they want to get the prize but they are wrong and ask the pumpkin worthless ...

We should only call consequential selfish who really knows what he wants to live well and strives to achieve. He who is tired of all that you feel bad (hate, criminal whims, lentils purchased at the price of tears, etc..) In the back would be selfish but do not know. It belongs to the guild of idiots and should prescribe a little awareness to be loved himself better.

A throne is not automatically granted or true love or respect: only guarantees fear adulation and servility. Especially when it gets through misdeeds, as in the case of Richard III. Instead of somehow compensate their physical deformity deforms Gloucester also inside. Neither of his hump and his limp was his fault, so there was no reason to be ashamed of unfortunate coincidences: those who laugh at him or despise him for they are the ones who should have been ashamed. For others saw him out misshapen, but inside he could have known intelligent, generous and worthy of affection, if he had truly loved himself, should have tried to externalize through his conduct that interior clean and straight, its true I. On the contrary, his crimes makes him his own eyes (when you look inside himself, where he alone bears witness) in a hideous monster that any physically deformed. Why? Because of their humps and moral lameness is himself responsible, unlike the others that were accidents of nature. The crown stained blood treason and makes you more friendly, much less: now we know less lovable than ever, and even he wants now.

words like "guilt" or "responsible". They sound which is usually related to consciousness,. I missed not only mention the more "ugly" in these titles: remorse. No doubt the bane of existence to Gloucester and not let him enjoy his throne or his power is above all the remorse of conscience. And so I wonder: do you know where they come from remorse? In some cases, tell me, are intimate reflections of the fear we feel about the punishment he may deserve our misbehavior. There is no worse punishment than realizing that you are boycotting their actions what they really want to be ...

What where they come from remorse? If we were not free, we could not feel guilty (or proud, of course) anything and would avoid remorse. So when we know we've done something shameful try to ensure that we had no other choice but to act so that we could not choose: "I fulfilled orders from my superiors," "I saw that everybody was doing the same", "lost his head" 'is stronger than I, "" I did not realize what he was doing "and so on. If, however, has drawn something nice then announce: "I've done by myself, nobody helped me!" Similarly, and more, we want to always be free to take credit for what we accomplished but we prefer to confess' slaves of circumstances "when our actions are not exactly glorious.

Seriousness of freedom is that every free act that I limited my ability to choose and one of them. And the trap is not worth waiting to see if the result is good or bad before assuming whether or not I am responsible.

Being responsible is known and truly free, for good and evil go through with the consequences of what we have done, to amend the bad that can be amended and maximize the good. what to skip. Supporters of authoritarianism strongly believe in the irresistible and argue the need to ban everything that can be overwhelming

amaciones.

The crux of the responsibility, if you must know, is not simply about having the bravery or honesty of assuming their own blunders no excuses left and right. All my decisions make mark on myself before letting the world around me.

Opinion
The author then I think we raised the ambition, which I think is another problem for achieving what is the good life for us, where we talk about Richard III Sahakespeare, where from my point of view Ricardo never failed to be happy as he believed that to be happy enough to get him to the throne, but this had to eliminate all the people who were first on, but to kill all these people did not know who was also killed his happiness and that was Left alone, the king now never failed to be happy, at least while it remains king and remorse for their actions will be always be remembered for his conscience.

After speaking of the difference in personalities between that which is good and bad.

8. Put yourself in his place

If you do not know how to manage to survive on natural hazards, lost his life, which certainly is a big nuisance, but if you have no idea of ethics, which is lost or wasted human life and that does not has no grace, frankly, neither

There is no worse enemy than a clever enemy, capable of making detailed plans of setting traps to trick or a thousand ways.

"To get up today, think that throughout the day you will meet a liar, with a thief with a adulterer, with a murderer. And remember that you must treat them as men because they are as human as you and therefore you are as essential as it is the lower jaw to the top. "However bad they are, their humanity coincides with mine and reinforces it.

No bug, by loving, can give me as much as another human being, even though a human being something unpleasant. But that 'care' can not consist primarily in suspicion or malice, but in a regard that has to handle fragile things, things most fragile of all ... But two things were clear enough that I think are very important:

And who "has come" to be something abhorrent as human remains can still return to transform back into what is best for us, the most essential ...

In all that we call "civilization," culture ", etc.., There is a little invention and a lot of imitation. If we were not as copycats, each man should always start everything from scratch.

Now, if the more happy and cheerful feel less like someone will be bad. it is seeking. The world is full of "urchins" or shameless rascals who are considered extremely astute when profit from the good intentions of others and even their misfortunes.

What is treat people like people, that is, humanely?

For someone tries to step into his shoes and understand what it does and what he feels.

When I talk about "relativize" your interest I mean that that interest is not yours alone, like you're living alone in a world of ghosts, but that puts you in touch with other realities as "real" as yourself.

Seriously take you to another, ie being able to put in place to accept in practice that is as real as yourself does not mean that you should always give the right to claim or what he does.

Opinion:

9. Both Gusto

That really is "bad" is one who believes that there is something wrong with enjoying ... He who is ashamed of joyful capabilities of your body is so stupid as he is ashamed of having learned the multiplication table.

Symbols are added and refinements, precious inventions that freedom without which men would not be men. The more one separates sex from procreation simple, less is more human and animal.

And as the sexual pleasure out among the most intense and alive that can feel, so it is surrounded by such emphatic caution misgivings.

That ensures that the signal that something is good is that we do not like it. The contention that always has more merit suffer than to enjoy (when in reality may be more worthy to enjoy rather than suffer wrong). And worst of all: the Puritan believes that when one has to live well and being embarrassed when one has a hard time is because it is living well. Of course, the Puritans people are considered more "moral" guardians of the world and also the morality of its neighbors.

The difference between 'use' and 'abuse' is precisely that: when you use a pleasure, you enrich your life and not only pleasure but life itself more and more like you, is a sign that you are abusing the note that the you will enjoy life and impoverishing the already not interested in life, but only that particular pleasure.

Sometimes we say this' I'm dying to taste. " This is a "death" to live longer and better, which makes us more sensitive, more sweet and fiercely passionate. The "self-preservation" at all costs is very nice but not more than that: an instinct. And humans live a bit beyond the instincts or not the thing has little grace.

A "yes" to life spontaneously springs from within us, sometimes when least expected. Who is happy and has received the top prize and not miss anything, who has no joy - by wise-looking, healthy, rich, powerful, holy, and so on., That is - is a wretch who lacks the most important. The negative limit of pleasure is not pain, not even death, but the joy as we begin to lose by a particular delight, sure we are not enjoying what we want.

Rather than attempting to good use something that can be used poorly (ie, abuse), those who prefer robots are born to completely renounce it and if it may prohibit him from outside, so that their will be to do less exercise. "Do not let me in on a bingo, because I'll play it! The world is full of supposed "rebels" that all they want in the background is punishing them for being free, that some higher power of this world or otherwise prevent them from being alone with his temptations.

However, temperance is smart friendship that makes us enjoy. To anyone who tells you that pleasures are "selfish" because there is always someone suffering while you enjoy, you respond that it is good to help others as much as possible to stop suffering, but it is unhealthy to feel remorse for not being at that time also suffering or because they enjoy as the other would enjoy. To understand the suffering of those who suffer and try to remedy that is no more interest because the other can also enjoy no shame because you're enjoying.

Opinion:

But he also says that sex is considered a bad thing because society through time to come making this activity should be regarded as the most common, has been established as preventing a man can keep doing what it does in normal days (work and other daily activities). This pleasure is not the only one to be at least temporarily happy, but there are others who think it can vary depending on the form of being and thinking of the individual against certain activities that you love this, this kind of pleasures are generally good all those who do we have more zest for life. But the greatest happiness or product to develop this is what we define as joy, concepts are also different for each person depending on the criteria and this lifestyle.

10. General Elections

The only thing that ethics is used to try to improve oneself, not to rebuke eloquently neighbor and the only certainty is that ethics know that the neighbor, you, me and others are all made by hand, one by one , with loving difference. So who roars we heard: "All ... (politicians, black capitalists, Australia, firefighters, which is preferred) are some immoral and have no shred of ethics! ", you may respond in kind:" Take care of yourself, so bud, you better ' or something similar.

His clientele demands it (who does not exaggerate the possibilities of the future before the voters and not places more emphasis on the difficulties in illusions, soon finds himself alone. We play our word that politicians have superhuman powers and then the disappointment will not forgive them inevitably cause us. If we relied less on them from the beginning, we would not learn to trust both of them later. Although ultimately it is always best to be regular, goofy and even a little "sausage" like you and I criticize them as long as possible, control them and cesarles time to time, the trouble is when they are 'leaders' right to which, as always involve themselves in possession of the truth no way to send home more than shots. ..

However, not missing important differences between ethics and politics. Consider a trivial case: respect to indications of traffic lights.

Do not mind those who tell you that the world is politically unlivable, which is worse than ever, anyone can claim to lead a good life (ethically speaking) in a situation as unjust, violent and aberrant as we live. But in all times there have been people to live better or at least engaged in trying to live well. When they could, worked together to improve the society in which they had drawn unfold, and if that were not possible, at least not worse, which most times is not bad.

If you look a little like what we have been saying here (I fear, alas, that the roll will be too long to remember it all) aspects of that ideal as you can think carefully thinking about the issue:

Refrain dictatorships, especially those that are 'for our sake. " Our greatest good is to be free.

b) Basic principle of the good life, as we have seen, is treating people as people, ie being able to put ourselves in the place of our neighbors and to relativize to align our interests with theirs. If you prefer to put it another way, trying to learn to consider the interests of others as if they were yours and yours as if they were of another.

c) Experience of life revealed in the flesh, even the most fortunate, the reality of suffering. Take the other seriously, putting in place, is not only to recognize their dignity as such but also sympathize with their pains, with the misfortunes that own error, accident, casualty or biological necessity afflict him, as sooner or later may afflict all. The hard part is to ensure that this assistance is not at the expense of freedom and dignity.

What I think is clear is that many of the problems we face today to five billion human beings who packed the planet (and the census is, alas, growing) can not be solved, not even well posed, rather than globally for everyone.

If not, what we get is a variety of crimes, not cultures.

Opinion:

The Ethics and politics see them as "activities" that are related to freedom, but in a different way because it raises ethics freedom individually but to all policy and provides for freedom but in a general way and through activities that are necessary for the policy work.

Fernando Savater

Dlaczego jestem na Couchsurfing

HOW I PARTICIPATE IN COUCHSURFING

Sincerely try to participate when informing all you can about the site and contact people who often advises me because I am new to this, but hopefully in the not too distant future be more useful and beneficial to the couchsurfing community.

COUCHSURFING EXPERIENCE

Well, being new I have had virtually no previous experience, except a party who performed the couchsurfing community of my country where I could meet many interesting people and who shared the same desires that I honestly was very nice meeting you and guided me a lot more to initiate improvements in the community.

Zainteresowania

Meeting people from around the world, investigating people across all cultures that I could be possible, learning languages, traveling everywhere, explore life, learn a lot, another lot fun, spreading happiness and maximize my communication with all those who can to that way when it comes time to leave this world do so pleased to know that I leave with much more than what I came to him and leave him much of what I really am.

• animals
• arts
• culture
• writing
• books
• performing arts
• fashion
• acting
• dancing
• causes
• ethics
• coffee
• exercise
• dieting
• running
• athlete
• partying
• flying
• clothing
• politics
• movies
• chess
• reading
• traveling
• socializing
• drawing
• coding
• magic
• music
• cycling
• camping
• cricket
• business
• teaching
• languages
• law
• mathematics
• philosophy
• science
• tourism

Muzyka, filmy i książki

FILMS: Gladiador, Gattaca, El último Samurai, El último Emperador, Yo Robot, Matrix Triology, El Señor De Los Anillos, Star Wars, Star Trek, Memento, El Padrino Trilogía, American History X, Tropa De Elite, Ciudad De Dios, American Pie, Dracula De Coppola, La Maquina Del Tiempo.

MUSIC: All styles

BOOKS: Cosmos, Kamasutra, La Conexion Cosmica, El Principito, Don Quijote, La Maquina Del Tiempo, el arte de la guerra, La República, El Camino Del Guerrero, el camino de la felicidad, El Alquimista, Los Renglones Torcidos De Dios, El Principe, romeo y julieta, El Mundo De Sofia, Etica para Amador.

Jedna niesamowita rzecz, którą zrobiłem(-am)

The most amazing thing for me is always what is coming.

Ucz innych, ucz się sam, udostępniaj

For now do not feel qualified to teach anything that might contribute to others in this matter because I do not have much experience in traveling, but I promise when I can put everything here may be useful for this purpose.

Kraje, w których byłem(-am)

Argentina, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Croatia, France, Italy, Serbia, Spain

Kraje, w których mieszkałem(-am)

Brazil, France, Serbia, Uruguay